Cameras & Drones
Polaroid Now Gen 2 Review: Autofocus Finally Comes to Modern Polaroid
- Brand:
- Polaroid
- Ages:
- 13+ years
- Updated:
- 2026-07-20
The verdict
The Now Gen 2's autofocus upgrade is a genuine, meaningful improvement over the original Now, and it's the most sensible current entry point into classic square Polaroid film — just go in accepting that per-shot cost and exposure unpredictability are part of the format, not a flaw unique to this camera.
Pros
- The autofocus two-lens system noticeably improves the keeper rate over the original Polaroid Now's fixed-zone focus
- Compatible with the full range of i-Type and 600 film, including color, black-and-white, and duochrome variants
- Genuinely simple point-and-shoot operation that works for parties and non-photographers
- Companion app adds double exposure, remote shutter, and light painting modes for more creative shots
Cons
- Polaroid film is expensive per shot and, by the format's own reputation, inconsistent in color and exposure between packs
- Developing images takes several minutes and the print is light-sensitive during that time, unlike Instax's faster develop
- No manual exposure control for anyone who wants to correct the format's known unpredictability
- Bulkier and heavier than Instax Mini format cameras
This review is based on Polaroid's published specifications for the Now Gen 2 and the consistent pattern of reviewer and owner feedback comparing it to the original Polaroid Now and to Fujifilm's competing Instax line.
What autofocus actually fixes
The original Polaroid Now used a simple two-zone focus system that frequently missed on anything but straightforward group or landscape shots. The Now Gen 2's proper autofocus system is a real, noticeable improvement in keeper rate, particularly for closer or off-center subjects — a genuine fix to the previous model's biggest weakness.
Living with classic Polaroid film
None of Polaroid's format quirks have changed: i-Type and 600 film remains expensive per shot, prints develop over several minutes and need to be shielded from light while doing so, and color/exposure consistency between packs has a real, well-documented reputation for variability. Buyers should treat this as part of the charm, not a defect to expect fixed.
Who it's for
Best for anyone who specifically wants the classic square Polaroid look and doesn't mind the cost and unpredictability that comes with it. If you want a cheaper, more consistent instant format, Fujifilm's Instax Mini line is the more budget-friendly alternative.
Frequently asked
- What film does the Polaroid Now Gen 2 use?
- It's compatible with Polaroid's i-Type film and classic 600 film, including color, black-and-white, and special-edition duochrome variants.
- Is the autofocus actually reliable?
- It's a real improvement over the original Now's simpler two-zone focus system and noticeably raises the keeper rate, though instant film's exposure variability remains a separate, unrelated factor.
- How long does a Polaroid print take to develop?
- Several minutes, and the print should be kept away from direct light while developing — this is a known characteristic of the format, not specific to this camera.
- Is the Polaroid Now Gen 2 worth buying?
- Yes, if you specifically want the classic square Polaroid format and accept the real per-shot cost and exposure variability that comes with it. If budget and consistency matter more, Fujifilm's Instax line is the more practical alternative.
You might also like
Cameras & Drones
RS 3 Mini
DJI · Ages 13+ years
- 2kg payload capacity in a genuinely compact, lightweight gimbal body that's easier to carry all day than DJI's larger RS models
- Touchscreen built directly into the gimbal for adjusting settings without needing the phone app open
- The 2kg payload limit rules out larger mirrorless bodies paired with telephoto lenses — DJI's bigger RS gimbals are needed for that combination
Cameras & Drones
Brave 8
Akaso · Ages 13+ years
- Aggressively priced compared to GoPro or DJI, making it a low-risk way to find out if you'll actually use an action camera
- Dual front-and-rear screens are unusual to find at this price point
- Image quality, dynamic range, and stabilization clearly and consistently trail GoPro, DJI, and Insta360 in side-by-side comparisons — this is a budget compromise, not a flagship rival
Cameras & Drones
Max 2
GoPro · Ages 13+ years
- True native 8K 360 capture without software upscaling is a real jump over the original Max's lower-resolution output
- User-replaceable lenses mean a scratched dome no longer means retiring or servicing the whole camera
- 360 cameras remain a niche workflow — reframing and stitching genuinely take editing time and skill that casual buyers tend to underestimate
Buy from Amazon